Motsu's
View of Technology and
the Direction of Technology Education in 21st Century
Rho, Tae-Cheon(Prof. of CNU in
Korea) / Kim, Choon-Gil(Prof. of KAIST in Korea)
1. Introduction
As
scientific technology rapidly develops and has a stronger influence on society,
we must duly recognize its characteristics and objectives, and establish new
educational lines to educate technologically cultured person for the 21st
century Information Age. The
Oriental view of technology has been less studied than in the West.
The cosmopolitan philosophy of technology education has developed,
focusing mainly on the Western view of technology.
Motsu,
a Chinese philosopher, produced influential works and spoke for the subordinate
classes. He especially developed a
theory of protective warfare and championed 'Peace without War.'
What can we learn from Motsu's view of technology, which puts emphasis on
productive acts and practical techniques. What
of his points can we make use of for our own technology education
What are some important relationships between the Oriental view of
technology and technology education In
order to answer these current questions regarding technology education, I present some passages and stories of 『Motsu』,
written by Motsu or his disciples.
2.
Experimental Technology Education
In the age of the Warring States (770~221 B.C.), the Chinese philosopher
Motsu (478~392 B.C.) was an engineer who made defensive weapons and most of his
disciples were artisans who engaged in agriculture and handcraft. Motsu and his
disciples spoke for people's economic profits and political standpoints.
Motsu's philosophy is found in 『Motsu』,
and there remain the records of his observations and the results of his
experiments related with light and shadow, a pinhole, a concave mirror, a convex
mirror, and a lever.
Motsu understands the straightness of light through his scientific
observations and experiments by using a pinhole. In Motsu
he wrote of a phenomenon that there is a person's upside-down shadow on the
opposite wall of the room because of the reflection of the sun, when he pierces
a little hole on the wall towards the sun in a dark room and puts a person out
of the house.
Motsu explains the difference of a flat mirror, a concave mirror, and a
convex mirror experimentally. For example, he says that 'if a person looks down
on the mirror, he can see his own upside-down image' and that 'in a convex
mirror the image is small and upside-down or big and right'. And with the
concave mirror he says that 'the closer the thing is to the (concave) mirror,
the stronger the light is, so that the image becomes bigger and bigger.' These
assertions by Motsu result from an elementary but proper experiments.
Motsus knew the basic principle of using a folding ladder as a weapon for
attacking castles, and the balance of a lever and the buoyancy of a boat.
Motsus found the basic principles of physical phenomenon through
observations and experiments on a pinhole, mirrors, a lever, and a boat.
From Motsu's observations and experiments, we can learn the importance of
experiment activities in teaching the technology courses.
3. Productive
Technology Education
Motsu,
who knew how to make wagons and wooden kites, lived in a mud-wall hut, surviving
wild spinach soup and bean leaves, eaten from an earthenware vessel, wearing
hemp or leather clothes. As shown
in one record, one of Motsu's disciples still had calluses
on his hands and feet three years after he served Motsu.
Indeed, Motsu and his disciples themselves worked and practiced
productive techniques.
Motsu
claims that each person should find some means of living for themselves, and
should also work for other people as well, no matter in which occupations they
are engaged. If people, including
nobles of the Warring States, were expected to work according to their
abilities, what should they do and how Motsu
said that the world would be peaceful when people followed occupations according
to their abilities and interests, such as buring clayware, tanning leather, and
making wagons, metal tools, and furniture for people's use.
What
kinds of vocational activities did Motsu regard as desirable
Motsu regarded agricultural technology as the most important productive
activity, as China was then an agricultural society.
He said that many farmers were needed to improve food production.
Motsu put emphasis on productive technology education, by working on
agriculture by himself and advocating the spreading of agricultural techniques.
4. Practical
Technology Education
Motsu placed practicality as first of all the objectives of technology.
He criticized the situation in which ships and wagons, which were made to
transport heavy loads, were being used for nobles of the Warring States and were
thus decorated and embellished. Thus,
the common people lost valuable time in their livelihoods.
He showed some examples of sages of old or wise men who practiced every
retrenchment and developed new techniques for daily necessities.
He, therefore, warned people not to produce or own too many items, such
as: clothes, houses, clayware, furniture, wagons, ships, tools, weapons, etc.
He deplored the fact that nobles had their palaces built in a luxurious
style, but paid no attention to castles or forts, a practice which would bring
about disaster. He blamed nobles
for their luxurious life styles, such as looking for a more convenient life, a
better design, more beautiful music, or more delicious dishes, though poor
common people had to work harder than ever for those nobles.
Motsu
saw the objective of technology as the enlargement of common people's benefits
and to save them hardships. When
Kong-Suvan, a weapon engineer of the same period as Motsu, after three years
work, made a kite with shaved bamboo and wood, which successfully flew 3 days in
the sky, Motsu esteemed it less than a wagon bolt because the 3-inch wagon bolt
could make it possible to carry 3 ton load, though that special kite only
excited nobles' interests and might be used for war.
If Motsu's concept is interpreted in modern terms, ships and motors are
much more worthy than nuclear weapons or missiles. As he says, without a doubt, technology education should be
practical.
5. Peaceful
Technology Education
Motsu
not only manufactured defensive military equipment, but he also endeavored to
prevent wars. He denied any
justified doctrine or theory of war, by pleading, "Peace from power."
Motsu opposed even wars to castigate the unrighteous because wars
destroyed common people's wealth, deprived them of time for agriculture which
lead to poor productivity. When one of his disciples three times invaded No-Dynasty,
with a General of Je-Dynasty, Motsu called on the general to part with the
disciple.
Once
the king of Choi-Dynasty intended to attack Song-Dynasty by having Kong-Suvan
develop a portable suspension bridge, an advanced offensive equipment, which was
designed to attack castles. It had 6 wheels, all sides surrounded with leather
for protection, and an extended ladder to reach over a castle wall.
Motsu tried to dissuade the king from standing the war.
Motsu suggested that he and Kong-Suvan have a simulated battle on a table
because Motsu had also developed methods to defend the castle from the attack
bridge. Motsu untied his belt which
functioned as a castle and chose several pieces of wood as attack equipment.
Kong-Suvan attacked the
model castle, changing his strategies nine times, all of which failed because
Motsu had better defensive strategies, and even one more than Kong-Suja‘s 9
strategies. Kong-Suvan admitted his
defeat and abandoned the idea of war against Song-Dynasty.
As
Motsu still worried that the king had not truly give up the war, and might try
to kill him, he sent 300 of his disciples to Song-Dynasty, to defend the castle
with his newly developed defensive weapons.
This episode shows that Motsu is like an engineer.
Motsu also developed tactics to hold in check ladder wagons, soldiers
through tunnels, and gate breakers. He
enhanced the fort height and width, arranged soldiers at appropriate places, and
prepared counterattacks with bows, stones, sand, ash, and fire.
Motsu's
pacifism was
practical. He was an acting
pacifist engineer and showed what attitudes engineers should have concerning war
and weapon technology. What we in
the modern world need is technicians, active, practical, and pacific, as was
Motsu.
6. Conclusion
We
have examined Motsu's Technology-Concepts and objectives, contents, and methods
of technology education on the view point of it. According to the Motsu's
Technology-Concepts, the object of technology education should be the practical
use for common people; for effective technology education, practical experiences
be needed; students and prospective technicians themselves need to experience
experimental and productive activities. Technology education also necessarily strives for peace.
Technologically educated man and woman should not only be functional, but
are expected to contribute to world peace.
Experimentalism , productivity, practicality, and peace are fundamental
in technology education.