|
Download the rtf version of this file.
Email and web-based
telecommunications projects
Introduction
When teachers begin to use the Internet with students, they may
begin by making use of the world wide web as an information source.
This anonymous use of the Internet may be difficult to manage
logistically in a school with poor connectivity and large class groups,
and is not necessarily taking advantage of the connectivity the
Internet promises. The ideas for online activities
Importance of existing classifications for this project
In the Natcom 3 models,
associations chose a design or combinations of activity ideas that they
believed would help teachers improve online activity in their KLA. This
was tempered by an understanding of the breath of teacher needs in the
KLA professional community and the logistics in which teachers operate
in Australian schools.
Classifications of online activity are
useful to help teachers and project designers describe their
experiences and develop new ideas which emerge from existing practice.
The Natcom project considered some classification schemes in an
analysis of existing activity ideas. These classifications helped
association choose ideas for online activity and reinvent others.
The work of well-known telecommunications experts was drawn
together. Judi Harris, classifies email-based projects into categories
and structures. The Global SchoolNet foundation has some project
classifications which are similar to those of July Harris. Lindy
McKeown also developed a schema to classify projects. These are
combined here to provide a broad brush consideration of
telecommunications activity likely to be practiced in Australian
schools when teachers participate in organised telecommunications
projects with other teachers and students.
The following list
of types of organised projects and online activities divides the list
into three categories: interpersonal exchanges, where students are
involved in interactive exchanges with other people; Gathering and
sharing data and information with other classes; and Problem solving,
where students undertake longer activities where solving problems and
issues directs the activity design. Most activities listed here could
easily be described in each of the categories. They are categorised
according to their main focus. In project models developed in Natcom 3,
activities satisfied a number of purposes.
|
Interpersonal Exchanges
|
|
Keypals
|
usually involves pairs of students exchanging
email. Without teacher structure, the excitement about writing to
another student diminishes. Keypals can be complemented by real-time
chats.
|
|
|
|
|
Global classrooms
|
two classes studying a common topic at
the same time agree to share their knowledge, perhaps have debates and
test ideas with the remote audience.
|
|
|
|
|
Learning circles
|
project
based partnerships between multiple schools engaged in a topic
simultaneously. Margaret Reil's model original involved a structured
set of interdisciplinary themes organised by participating teachers.
|
|
|
|
|
Electronic appearances
|
hosting a special guest in the
classroom using telecommunications technologies. In Australia, this is
often called an online guest event and is part of a larger set of
activities within a project.
|
|
|
|
|
Telementoring
|
providing students
with access to experts who work in the fields students are studying.
Problem solving experts, career mentors or content specialists are
common mentors.
|
|
|
|
|
Impersonations
|
where students act in character
or older students act in the character for younger students. These need
to be part of scenario based problem solving activities or be well
structured exchanges for them to be sustainable.
|
|
|
|
|
Ask-an-expert
|
where experts are available to answer students
questions over a period of time or as part of a synchronous event at a
certain time.
|
|
Gathering and sharing
|
|
Information exchanges
|
where students collect and disseminate data on a common
topic. This might involve students using online tools to store and then
retrieve the information or may be adhoc exchanges of information over
a set period of time
|
|
|
|
|
Electronic publishing
|
where students
publishing is shared in an organised way across themes, classifications
of schools or time periods. This usually involves greater than one
school and may be complemented by a competition format, where students
are engaged in problem solving activities and publish their solutions.
Others have a gallery format and create an audience for students' work.
Others might involve simultaneous writing projects, shared activities
during the process of writing, and joint publications like newspapers.
|
|
|
|
|
Telefieldtrips
|
where students
invite others to share in their field trips electronically, or
where records of fieldtrips are available for others. Some variations
include the trek-an-explorer or adventurer model. |
|
Problem solving
|
|
Information searches
|
where students are engaged in seeking information to solve problems.
This may be linked to a competition model. Most projects involve low
level fact-searching exercises rather than problem solving. Internet
hunts is a common term.
|
|
|
|
|
Parallel problem solving
|
a variation
of information searches with greater cognitive depth. Students compare
solutions to open-ended problems once they have published their own
solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
Project compilations
|
involve students working on
open-ended problems and developing solutions for others to use. Usually
students are involved in gathering and synthesising information a round
a topic. Teachers may select a curriculum approach like information
literacy to guide students through the problem solving process.
|
|
|
|
|
Telepresentations
|
involve students simultaneously presenting or
taking action at the one time. It is usually around a theme or event
(world peace day). Students share what they will do and may use the
project network to seek partners for activities.
|
|
|
|
|
Social action projects
|
involve students taking action on a common problem.
Students might undertake local action that relates to a global issue or
may meet online to discuss solutions with panels of experts. Students
might be invited to participate in a simulation of an event and play
roles, especially in debate and online conventions. Students may simply
debate ideas for action with other students.
|
When developing
project models suitable for Australian curriculum areas ideas from a
number of these activities were extended and combined into project
designs.
Other classifications may be useful
Although
telecommunications curriculum projects have particular styles and
classifications, they will be thought of by participants quite
differently. These ideas will complement the classifications above.
Who is involved?
Anonymous projects where teachers
and their classes can work mostly in isolation without having to
collaborate with others.
Projects with a guest in the classroom
where collaboration is between the teacher and (perhaps) another adult.
Projects which have two classes collaborating
Projects
where multiple classes are involved but do not rely on each other
Projects where multiple classes are involved but do rely on each
other
Timing
Projects which are short term.
Projects which are ongoing and can join at any time.
Projects which require considerable commitment of time at particular
times.
Projects which give degrees of freedom
Teachers can pick form a variety of themes and approaches
Teachers can choose parts of a project to do
Teachers can impose their own approaches into the project
- for example, choosing an
information literacy or project management approach to problems
which require students to collaborate
Projects which are
logistically practical in schools with varied access conditions
The technical infrastructure required to participate in a project
will; determine who can participate and perhaps who can match with
whom.
Amount of online time and types of time spent at various
activities may help classify a project, particularly for schools with
access issues.
The level of technical, classroom management
and project management expertise required by participating teachers and
students may determine the roles undertaken by classes and their
teachers.
Some projects enable teachers to learn different
things by participating. For example some teachers may participate to
learn how projects can be organised and managed. Other project designs
enable the participants to contribute to the design of future episodes.
The degree of organisation a teacher has to undertake, may
classify a project. Some teachers will be attracted to projects where
everything is organised for them, while others will be attracted to
more open-ended project designs where teachers decide on activities to
undertake under the project theme.
Incorporating participants needs in project design
Participants will decide if
they want to participate in a project based on issues that are
significant to their local conditions, their readiness to work
collaboratively and on their professional knowledge and technical
skills. Project managers need to design projects which will help
teachers allay their fears and solve their problems. Although
curriculum needs may be at the forefront of project design, it may be
that the logistical issues determine if teachers are willing to
participate. In developing projects, it is essential that project
mangers incorporate design attributes that enhance the management of
the project. Part of this involves describing the ideas, concepts and
structures in a way that helps teachers understand the purposes and
procedures of the project. The classification systems described in this
document may provide a shared understanding and common language with
which to discuss project ideas.
In this project, Natcom
associations reinvented some of these ideas, taking account of
Australian curriculum issues, professional development issues and
logistical concerns. The resultant suite of models is not an exhaustive
combination of project models, but rather represents a selection of
ideas that are worth pursuing in the immediate future if Australian
teachers are to gain sufficient knowledge and experiences to create the
next generation of innovative projects.
|